Parse error: syntax error, unexpected '<' in /opt/bitnami/apache2/htdocs/forums/archive/global.php(117) : eval()'d code on line 1
Jack Reacher-Never Go Back [Archive] - StangBangerz Forums
PDA

View Full Version : Jack Reacher-Never Go Back


Goldenpony
02-01-2017, 10:45 PM
Absolutely a 5 star rating!!! :popcorn:

Now I'm waiting for John Wick-Volume 2
redfirepearlgt
02-01-2017, 11:26 PM
Wow! Sequels seldom rate as good as the original. I figured like Beverly Hills Cop II Reecher's instinctive routine, like Valentines lying routine would get completely overcooked in the sequel. I look forward to seeing it.
Goldenpony
02-02-2017, 06:12 AM
Oh, by the way-Cobie Smulders is as hot as a firecracker too.
chris91
02-03-2017, 10:59 AM
I didn't like it as much as I liked the original. Not a bad movie but just not as good in my opinion.
Goldenpony
02-03-2017, 02:41 PM
Really? I liked it every bit as much as the first.
Rick93coupe
02-04-2017, 12:10 PM
I enjoyed it but I'm with Chris, I think the first one was much better. I watch the first one and John Wick all the time, cant wait for the Wick sequel!
ibstrokin
02-09-2017, 10:56 PM
Meh...the first one was better. Not horrible though.
k062693w
02-11-2017, 10:48 PM
Just bought it today and just finished watching it ...
Definitely a Good Movie, But as above not as good as the first one ...

Planning on going Tuesday to see John Wick 2 ...
Ackbar00
02-14-2017, 08:32 AM
I thought it pretty much sucked. If that is what you rate as a 5 star movie.....

Highlights:
Chrysler 200's that sound like V8's
Child with daddy issues, is it his, is it not. Really ruined the movie.


I bet $20 John Wick 2 will be much the same.