View Full Version : HB 203
Pops Fun
10-29-2013, 07:28 PM
Hi
Went to Columbus to hear Proponent testimony about HB 203. Session opened at 10am with a couple other bills then a 2 hour caucus/lunch. Started hearing testimony around 3pm for the bill. Lots of good testimony.
During the 2 hr break a dozen of us did a little protest with signs and guns showing. :D
HB203 (http://www.buckeyefirearms.org/node/8976) if passed will affect several things:
do away with duty to retreat
change reciprocity agreements
use ccl to buy guns without checks
lessen training hours.
Pops Fun
11-22-2013, 06:29 PM
Video of the House of Representatives vote on HB 203 We won
http://www.ohiochannel.org/MediaLibrary/Media.aspx?fileId=141322&startTime=9081&autoStart=True
89notch
11-22-2013, 07:34 PM
Its no secret I lean towards the liberal side but I for one was glad to see some reform come to the CCL laws. I personally hate the gun free zones people can put in their place of business. I know its their right as a property/business owner so I choose not to shop there. I however wouldn't mind if they did away with that portion of the law. I know its being discussed in committee right now and hope it goes away. Striping a law abiding citizen from having a firearm in no way prevents the non law abiding citizen from putting peoples safety in danger.
Black92LX
11-22-2013, 09:12 PM
Its no secret I lean towards the liberal side but I for one was glad to see some reform come to the CCL laws. I personally hate the gun free zones people can put in their place of business. I know its their right as a property/business owner so I choose not to shop there. I however wouldn't mind if they did away with that portion of the law. I know its being discussed in committee right now and hope it goes away. Striping a law abiding citizen from having a firearm in no way prevents the non law abiding citizen from putting peoples safety in danger.
Or make it like other states Ky in particular, it's not illegal to enter a posted establishment, just illegal to stay if asked to leave.
duststang
11-25-2013, 09:01 AM
IMOP, if they take your right away then they are liable for your protection. If anything does happen then they should be held accountable.
5.0calypso93lx
11-25-2013, 10:25 AM
IMOP, if they take your right away then they are liable for your protection. If anything does happen then they should be held accountable.
I like that. :bigthumb
Pops Fun
11-25-2013, 05:51 PM
A radio show with 3 views of HB 203 !!
http://wosu.org/2012/allsides/prospects-for-ohios-stand-your-ground-law/
04 Venom
11-26-2013, 03:08 PM
Its no secret I lean towards the liberal side but I for one was glad to see some reform come to the CCL laws. I personally hate the gun free zones people can put in their place of business. I know its their right as a property/business owner so I choose not to shop there. I however wouldn't mind if they did away with that portion of the law. I know its being discussed in committee right now and hope it goes away. Striping a law abiding citizen from having a firearm in no way prevents the non law abiding citizen from putting peoples safety in danger.
Its simply a matter of exercising their right as a property owner.
04 Venom
11-26-2013, 03:11 PM
IMOP, if they take your right away then they are liable for your protection. If anything does happen then they should be held accountable.
Don't enter their property.
facemelter71
11-26-2013, 04:21 PM
They are liable if some thing happens to you and you cant defend yourself.
04 Venom
11-26-2013, 05:55 PM
They are liable if some thing happens to you and you cant defend yourself.
Show us a court decision where that has been the case.
facemelter71
11-27-2013, 11:52 AM
Let me rephrase it. They COULD BE held liable.
If you dont want people owning weapons,you need to move some where the government will take care of you.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.2 Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.