PDA

View Full Version : How taxes work



Goober
10-09-2008, 05:09 PM
I'm sure a few people here have read this before. It's available elsewhere on the internet as well. I just thought it would be nice to have our own localized copy of it in case no one actually has posted this on srd before.

I think about it every time I hear something along the lines of "tax cuts for the rich!" and other such nonsense. I remember a poster in one of my economics classes in highschool outlining that the top 1% of income earners in this country paid (at the time, I believe it was post 2000 data) 85% of ALL taxes paid in the country, not just income. What's funny to me is the people who complain about "tax cuts for the rich" typically pay little or NO taxes whatsoever, and also frequently are people who not only DON'T pay anything (but the sales tax), but also COLLECT money from our government and then complain they aren't "getting anything back". Shit gets me rollin


"Let's put tax cuts in terms everyone can understand.

Suppose that every day, ten men go out for dinner. The bill for all ten comes to $100. If they paid their bill the way we pay our taxes, it would go something like this:

* The first four men (the poorest) would pay
nothing.
* The fifth would pay $1.
* The sixth would pay $3.
* The seventh $7.
* The eighth $12.
* The ninth $18.
* The tenth man (the richest) would pay $59.

So, that's what they decided to do. The ten men ate dinner in the restaurant every day and seemed quite happy with the
arrangement, until one day, the owner threw them a curve.

"Since you are all such good customers," he said, "I'm going to reduce the cost of your daily meal by $20."

So, now dinner for the ten only cost $80. The group still wanted to pay their bill the way we pay our taxes.

So, the first four men were unaffected. They would still eat for free. But what about the other six, the paying customers?
How could they divvy up the $20 windfall so that everyone would get his 'fair share'?

The six men realized that $20 divided by six is $3.33. But if they subtracted that from everybody's share, then the
fifth man and the sixth man would each end up being 'PAID' to eat their meal.

So, the restaurant owner suggested that it would be fair to reduce each man's bill by roughly the same amount, and he
proceeded to work out the amounts each should pay.

And so:

* The fifth man, like the first four, now paid
nothing (100% savings).
* The sixth now paid $2 instead of $3 (33% savings).
* The seventh now paid $5 instead of $7 (28%
savings).
* The eighth now paid $9 instead of $12 (25%
savings).
* The ninth now paid $14 instead of $18 (22%
savings).
* The tenth now paid $49 instead of $59 (16%
savings).

Each of the six was better off than before. And the first four continued to eat for free. But once outside the restaurant, the men began to compare their savings.

"I only got a dollar out of the $20," declared the sixth man. He pointed to the tenth man "but he got $10!"

"Yeah, that's right," exclaimed the fifth man. "I only saved a dollar, too. It's unfair that he got ten times more than me!"

"That's true!!" shouted the seventh man. "Why should he get $10 back when I got only $2? The wealthy get all the breaks!"


"Wait a minute," yelled the first four men in unison. "We didn't get anything at all. The system exploits the poor!"

The nine men surrounded the tenth and beat him up.

The next night the tenth man didn't show up for dinner, so the nine sat down and ate without him. But when it came time to pay the bill, they discovered something important. They didn't have enough money between all of them for even half of the bill!

And that, boys and girls, journalists and college professors, is how our tax system works. The people who pay the highest taxes get the most benefit from a tax reduction. Tax them too much, attack them for being wealthy, and they just may not show up at the table anymore."

Goober
10-10-2008, 03:31 PM
Really? No one? I figured a liberal would have something to say

mach_u
10-10-2008, 04:51 PM
Tough to argue with the truth. :)

Gearhead
10-11-2008, 09:46 AM
My issue is with social security tax that caps out at $102,000 in wages per year.

If someone makes 150K per year, they have an overall effective tax rate that is less than someone who makes 80k per year.